Howdy!

Please check out my "Funny Stuff:" just below-right, for added enjoyment...

Monday, April 15, 2013

Over-the-Top: A New 'Insanity Virus'?


Over-the-Top: A New Insanity Virus?

Over the past few months, there seems to have been an escalating number of what appears to be totally absurd, even unbelievable,  statements and actions originating from our central government (and related minions). Myriad treasonous (and blatantly unconstitutional) proposals, legislations, press releases, leaked emails, statements, commentary, and activities can be attributed to the mainstream media (MSM), Congress, the Obama administration, and the various ‘alphabet’ agencies (CIA, FBI, DHS, DoJ, and so on). 

‘They’ have certainly gone ‘over-the-top’  with regard to labeling or targeting everyday Americans—damn near the majority of us—in their newest version of the ‘war on terror’. Yup, it’s focus is now ‘Joe Sixpack’, and, frankly, just about everyone else who doesn’t agree with their insane socialist-globalist agenda. This new policy is so extreme, and bizarre, that it defies logic; frankly, it’s rather scary to think that it really can happen here.

Although this has apparently been an ongoing process, more recently the escalation process seemed to start with the gun-grabbing assault on the second amendment (2A) following the unfortunate events at Sandy Hook. Henceforth, there has been an increasingly aggressive assault on our constitutional—inalienable—rights, as well as upon logical thought and reasonable action. OK; most everyone recognizes the lefties are pro-socialist drones, brainwashed by globalist propaganda for generations—but, insane? Absurd? That is, they seem to have been afflicted by some sort of mass-psychosis ‘event horizon’, and now it is just getting way past crazy; they have simply gone too far. It's like we all somehow got transported into the Bizzaro dimension. 

One particular escalation [which prompted this article] is the patently absurd attribution of groups ‘They’ see as “extremists” or radicals, and/or those viewed as potential [so-called] ‘terrorists’. It started with the usual scapegoats; those groups that have been demonized in the past (eg., ‘right-wing’ militia groups, survivalists, etc.). However, over the past few months, such target groups have been replaced by the average American, the everyman, and even our veterans—those who fought to preserve our freedoms and our very way of life. This is truly insane!

 The (below) YouTube video goes a long way in explaining the scope of the madness:

Video uploaded by Infowars…"Is the Government Targeting Patriots & Christians?"



Yes, insanity has overcome the whole DC crowd, and all their cronies. That is, as explicated below, their ever-expanding list of ‘extremists’, and  pseudo-terrorists now includes the majority of Americans. This is the crux of the conundrum; If the majority of Americans (yes, I’m included in there too) are ‘extremists’, then what does one call these accusers? It seems only logical to assert that ‘they’ are the ones who are extremists, not these groups of average American citizens. By definition, ‘extremist’ is defined as follows:
(Wikipedia definition)
         “Extremism (represented on both sides of the political spectrum) is any ideology or political act far outside the perceived political center of a society; or otherwise claimed to violate common moral standards. In democratic societies, individuals or groups that advocate the replacement of democracy with an authoritarian regime are usually considered to be extremists; in authoritarian societies, people who espouse democratic or otherwise liberal ideals are labelled as extremists by the ruling class or government.”
As suggested, advocating authoritarian views and policies  would be deemed extremist, in the USA. That is our current situation. Welcome to Amerika! Sieg Heil! It is ‘They’ who are outside the political center—they who are advocating the extremist policies. As far as being ‘way out there’ in the spectrum of social and political ideals, it is the ‘Bamanites’, and not their targeted population (We, the people).
What is certain is that, in general, the average American is not in favor of openly authoritarian rule, but is, instead, pro-freedom and pro-Constitution. Sure, many of us are highly brainwashed and pre-programmed by years of cradle-to-grave propaganda, even a lot of total sheep, but I don’t think we are willing participants in this takeover, as the administration leads us to believe (eg., the '90%+' want tougher gun regulation LIE)

************************************************
Let’s take a closer look at the [absurd] groups that they now claim are threats to the current regime*, and the huge numbers of everyday Americans these groups comprise:
[*note: see “Clickable References” below for sources, citations, and more information re: superscripted notations]
  • Religious  “extremists”: No discrimination here…it’s just about everybody…(see Fig. 1a and 1b)
    • Christiansa:
    • Evangelical &/or any Christian “identity”
    • Catholics
    • Mormon (fundamentalist)
    • Jews (Orthodox, JDL, and others)
    • Islamists, Muslims of various sort, and some admittedly radical groups, like KKK, etc.
    • “Islamophobia” [ya, not really a religious group]
Figure 1a. Groups claimed to be ‘religious extremists’ in current US Army training aid.
**above^
Figure 1b. USA Religious Affiliation percentages.
Figure 2. American ‘White’ Male Population, aged 18-74 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011 American Community Survey; table modified for clarity  see also: 
  • Anybody who has ever been treated or diagnosed with a DSM mental ‘disorder’e, which includes anxiety and/or depression. Vets are now receiving notices that they are deemed unfit for gun ownership [without due process], and urged or coerced into evaluations &/or illegal gun confiscations; this is a function of Medical or Psychiatric Tyranny
    • Unfortunately, what seems to be the trend in psychology, and especially psychiatry, is a desire to claim that normal variations in behavior and mood are somehow ‘disorders’, paired with an appropriate medication. This follows the ‘medical model’. However, the vast majority of these so-called disorders have no objective biological or genetic markers. They are simply arbitrary and subjective labels. 
    IMHO, it’s all about the big pharma-big psych money [$$]; I contend that the majority of ‘disorders’ are fairly common, transient, and self-resolving events. In fact, many ‘psychotropics’ are no more effective than placebo, in most cases. Also, such drugs have many dangerous side effects, some of which can even do lasting or permanent physiological harm. [note: The author does claim a degree of expertise in his opine, holding both a BA in psychology, and a MS in psychopharmacology] 
    The problem with both the labels and the ‘disease’ model is that now, your government wants to group and define you, and limit your rights, based upon such subjective criteria. It seems the administration is intent on using any prior diagnosis or treatment as proof of incapacity, without adjudication; a catch-all for even greater numbers of average citizens. Diagnosis or treatment is now so prevalent that a majority of people may be included in this ‘group’ at one time or another, at some point in their lifetime.  In fact, ever-increasing numbers of our children are being diagnosed with psychiatric ‘disorders’ and treated with psychotropics. It’s getting way out of hand.
    <√out the seminal documentary>:
See also: FULL INTERVIEW- VA Psychiatrist Exposes National Gun Confiscation Program  (Interview with VA whistleblower who reveals 'bamanite scheme [see above re: vets, also] )

Summary: 


The various groups and populations listed above make up a majority of all Americans. For example, the sub-group ‘Christians’ make up nearly 80% of the population, just for starters. Although it would be difficult to separate these groups into discrete populations, because many people are members of two or more of groups, it is reasonable to assert that the addition of members of all the other (non-religious) groups would certainly add even more people to the list of ‘extremists’. Adding to that all the other persona non grata groups listed by the current regime, and masses of radical extremists could go over 90%. I think that it can safely be stated that 90%—or even 50%—of a population CANNOT BE CALLED EXTREMIST; we’re talking moderate, average, or everyday Americans here—the majority. WTH is wrong with these ‘bamanites? Are they simply insane? It seems as if they have all gone over-the-top.
The populations of these so-called ‘extremist’ groups makeup the majority of Americans. It is both irrational and illogical to assert that the majority of people are now somehow radicals—by any definition. Instead, the real extremists are government elites, propagandists and their (mainstream) media minions who support and purvey such crapola. These people need to be stopped—arrested, and maybe even institutionalized—they are evidently not thinking rationally, and have suffered a break with reality. 
Q: Can we continue to allow certifiably-insane people to run our government, or to maintain control over our news and information, our money, our society or our national security? 

A: --Hell, no!

Q: To Rob us of our God-given--inalienable--rights, &/or infringe upon our Constitutional rights?

A: --Hell, no!

*******************************************************************
Problem: The Tragedy of the 'Sheeple'
I think that a majority of people just want to live their lives, and to be left alone (alas, poor sheeple). I concur, wholeheartedly. However, the problems we face now are the direct result of the "me-me" attitude, ignorance, and apathy. Many people just don't seem to 'get it'--they aren’t even aware of anything strange or sinister happening right now, because it doesn’t directly affect them. 
The sheeple go about their compartmentalized lives, and watch their MSM news, while shoving GMO chips into their mouths, by the handfuls. They chomp and drool on their microwave platters, and mindlessly text what few friends they have, and go on to their mindless, compartmentalized jobs, day after day. They blindly go about their day-to-day, not realizing that there are a tiny minority of Banksters out there taking away the majority of their earnings via taxes paid to their minions in the government, while simultaneously lowering the value of what little he has left. They actually believe that paper is somehow “money”…
Poor, ignorant, trusting “Joe Sheeple”; he actually believes that there is a difference between Dems and Reps, and that his vote ‘counts’. He maintains a positive attitude regarding his gub’ment, and trusts that they are, deep-down, striving to benefit he and his fellow Americans. Police, the military, and ‘Homeland Security’ are there to “serve and protect”. There are no bullets. ‘They’ will never invoke the NDAA…whatever that is…
Poor Joe…He spends more time ‘farming’ on Farmville (™) than he does actual gardening in his yard. He actually believes all those food-like products, the chemical cleaners, and the personal care goods in the supermarket are tested, safe and/or nutritious—hey, the gub’ment wouldn’t allow food companies to poison us—would they? He has no backup food storage, and will begin the painful march to starvation, as soon as supermarket shelves are emptied, [following the false flag event-to-come]. He doesn’t even know what ‘SHTF’ means. He doesn’t believe in owning guns, and questions why anybody else would ‘need’ an ‘assault rifle, much less a high capacity ‘clip’...
However, even Joe Sheeple will soon wake up, once the ‘proverbial’ tipping point is reached—when things get really bad, and start affecting him and his; he too, will join in the fight against these insane globalist usurpers. We will have the numbers on our side. We have powerful liberty-loving hearts and minds that will overcome. If it comes to war, we will prevail, because we have ‘right’ and ‘good’ and yes, God,  on our side—against Him, who could prevail?
*********************************************
Q: Has Washington somehow been infected by some kind of ‘insanity’ virus? Perhaps a strain of socialist-idiot pox? Maybe there is a new strain of an IQ-lowering bacteria in the water?[GMO?] WTH? Are the left-leaners eating a big [no, HUGE] box of Dumb-Ass for breakfast—everyday?
Maybe it’s a box of GMO Dumb-Ass…
(Blame that on Obama too; he maintains a constant assault on us via his Monsanto ‘food-fascism’ force.)
A: I don’t claim to know WTH-ever is happening to these yo-yos, and I don’t have all the answers. However, I do know that whatever it is, it’s dangerous, and we must resist and rebel against their push for what seems to be their goal of total, authoritarian, takeover; you and me, and all of the remaining who are awake and still ‘sane’. The time has come to take away these usurpers’ government-rule ‘toys’ and send them to the rubber room for a bit of ‘time-out’.
Conclusion:  All of he foregoing groups comprise a large majority of ‘everyday’ Americans. Those who believe in freedom, justice, and the American way; a nation of people who believe in God and the golden rule, and who are wary of a potentially tyrannical government. These people have different sociocultural and political views, espouse different religious beliefs, and may differ by many characteristics. However, It’s not about race or politics—or any other divisive distinction. We are all brothers-in-arms, when we come under attack. We all experienced this patriotic sense of solidarity, after the events of 9/11; we need to rekindle our unified American identity in order to affect changes, take back our sovereignty, and restore the USA to its constitutional republic status. We are under attack, people. WAKE UP!
¿y T u ?
GT—a fellow patriot
Bibliography & References:
* ‘Clickable References’ here…
a) Full Report (143 pages) Christians, in general, estimated to be 78.4% of all adults; of that group 23.9% are Catholic (see Fig. 1, below)
b) Some relevant Vet stats include:
“22 million…living military veterans in the U.S.
1.6 million…female veterans in 2011
2.3 million…black veterans in 2011
1.8 million…veterans younger than 35 in 2011
7.5 million…Vietnam-era veterans in 2011 – or 35 percent of veterans
5.1 million…veterans who served during the Gulf War and post 9/11 – or about 29 percent of current veterans
[also] 3.5 million…veterans with a service-connected disability rating. Of these, 810,245 have a rating of 70 percent or higher ”
  
c) Estimates [2010] include 40-45% households have guns, and 30-35% of adults, or ~70-80 million Americans own guns (including 40-45 million handgun owners);
d) As of most recent estimates [US Census data], ~75% of the US population(~315 million)  is ‘white’, and so approximately 38% —or about 121 million are white males. 
To be more realistic, population-wise, see the chart (Fig. 2) for [white]males 18-65 years old. A pretty large chunk of the US population, to say the least.
e) Although difficult to get a true grasp on the sheer number of people who might be diagnosed as having a mental ‘disorder, NIMH claims:
“Mental disorders are common in the United States and internationally. An estimated 26.2 percent of Americans ages 18 and older — about one in four adults — suffer from a diagnosable mental disorder in a given year.1 When applied to the 2004 U.S. Census residential population estimate for ages 18 and older, this figure translates to 57.7 million people.2 Even though mental disorders are widespread in the population, the main burden of illness is concentrated in a much smaller proportion — about 6 percent, or 1 in 17 — who suffer from a serious mental illness.1 In addition, mental disorders are the leading cause of disability in the U.S. and Canada.3 Many people suffer from more than one mental disorder at a given time. Nearly half (45 percent) of those with any mental disorder meet criteria for 2 or more disorders, with severity strongly related to comorbidity.1
In the U.S., mental disorders are diagnosed based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV).4”

**[note: Some content contained herein may be copyrighted via the respective sources. However, utilization within this article is condoned via the "Fair Use" clause, being of a non-commercial nature, and for purposes of education and/or research; see below:
**Limitatons on exclusive rights: Fair Use
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use, the factors to be considered shall include:
1.The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2.the nature of the copyrighted work; 3.the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 4.the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. (added pub. l 94-553,
Title I, 101, Oct 19, 1976, 90 Stat 2546)]
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,
Reactions: 

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Fukushima & Other Environmental Sources of Radiation & Toxins: Mitigation & 'Doable' Detoxing



We have all been exposed to harmful radiation effects, from an increasingly large number of environmental sources, but 'They' won't tell you…


The Fukushima Radiation Drift: It's not confined to Japan, folks...

In the past, one can include several acute radiation 'melt-downs' which have dosed the world with radiation; the Three-Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima nuclear power plant accidents. Although we have been kept out of the loop on the actual 'after' effects, these incidents have irradiated large parts of the earth, and the effects have been dispersed throughout the atmosphere, and to lands all over the earth, via global weather patterns. One can be assured that these effects have been denied or minimized by TPTB/ business/government and lame-stream media reports; don't be fooled by these tricksters--look it up.

Other radiation Sources:

Another unrealized, or even suppressed, source of contamination is the cumulative effects of over 2000 nuclear 'tests' which have been done since the advent of atomic bombs, both above and below ground. It is difficult to understand why governments have and still do such insane 'tests' in our biosphere. Especially now that we understand the gravity of its true effects. WTF? Stop it, you bastards; we don't need more radiation damage on our planet. Anyways, we are stuck with the aftereffects, so do try to detox with an appropriate solution (see below).

Other common radiation sources are medical injections and scans, x-rays, airport body scanners, and all microwave towers, home microwave 'ovens', cell phones & wifi 'hotspots' (appropriately named), home networks, transformer [power] blocks, wireless DECT phones, TV towers, Power lines, and on, and on; this stuff is affecting most everyone daily, on a 24/7 basis. There have been quite a few low exposure, but almost no long-term studies to find either possible heath correlates or causal attributions with which to associate with these sources of radiation. Can you say "insidious"? Good.

One often unrecognized source of environmental radiation is radon, which is rather ubiquitous; there are home tests available for this, and if found at certain levels in/around your home, one must evacuate. I know, right? Get educated or get irradiated...

Do we simply sheepishly concede or accept that these radiation sources are harmless? Do we simply ignore the effects, and put our heads back into the sand (or our collective arses)? Do we go into 'denial mode' Like the FDA does with GMOs? Or with our 'drugs', which not only harm our bodies, but then are dumped back into the water [and recycle back to us via 'tap-to-toilet' waste-water treatments]? What about all those 'known toxic' food colorings, sweeteners, and food additives? Plastics and chemicals like BPA, BPB, phthalates, and toxins in our food and beverage containers, soaps, cleaners, household items, makeup, and personal hygiene goods? Should we ignore the harms done to us like the EPA does regarding pesticides and herbicides, and other environmental toxins from various processing, big Ag and manufacturing outlets? I think not.

There are folks who are making the big bucks out there, pushing their toxins on us through their advertising and social engineering propaganda, while we suffer and die from their short and long-term 'soft-killing' effects, both via radiation and the many chemicals put into our food, water, and environment. Could 'they' be doing this with purpose and intent? I would say that a preponderance of the evidence shows that the originators of these toxins and effects know that they are harmful, but continue to use them on us, and/or deny or coverup their effects, and mainstream media just give them a pass. Seem like collusion or a conspiracy? Yup, it sure does to me, at least. (it's kind of a 'Duh!' thang)

Why 'They' would want to poison us all with radiation and other environmental toxins seems elusive, though. Is it simply about the money, or is it a veiled attempt at global population control, or are they hoping to make us sick and diseased so that we must access the 'services' of Big Med and Big Pharma, who will bleed out our savings as they drain out our life. Perhaps all-of-the-above? Just doesn't make sense to me, personally. However, thank God that I can't think like those evil bastards.
*********************************************************
[Rant: As I had nearly finished this report, the news broke that 1/3 of west coast USA children born around the time of the Fukushima accident have been found to have increased chances of thyroid problems, due to radiation drift across the ocean(see graphic, above). Of course, the gov and their insiders were protected with preventative meds, but the public was never alerted to the known dangerous effects, nor were they informed or suggested to take steps to prevent harm. Furthermore, fish, cattle, and plants from the Japanese areas were and are, quite contaminated, BUT they are still calling them 'safe'. The gub'ment solution? To increase 'known safe levels' for radiation in tuna and other products. WHAT A CROCK. I suggest the same radioactivity effects could be said for the flora and fauna across much of our entire western coast, and perhaps throughout the USA, where weather patterns have carried the fallout and ash. Is there any testing for this??? Not that I have seen in any lame stream media reports…
This shows another failure of our government , and their puppet media, to simply tell the truth; at least SOME OF US could have tried to avoid or mitigate exposures…ESPECIALLY PREGNANT FEMALES AND NEWBORNS! Damned BASTARDS!  WE HAVE BEEN ABANDONED AND BETRAYED BY OUR SO-CALLED 'REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT'--AGAIN! This has simply reached the level of insanity…time to DO SOMETHING--WAKE UP, AMERIKA! There has obviously been a covert coup of fascist dictatorship and tyrannical takeover in the US. Don't you get it?]
********************************************************
How to Avoid, Mitigate, or Decrease Harmful Environmental Effects…
So, what to do (re: radiation)? First, avoid as many sources of environmental radiation and toxic exposures to radiation sources and chemicals in foods, on your body, and in your immediate environs (home, work, etc.). For example, stay well away from your microwave when heating foods--and don't be 'peeking' through the 'shielded' window; you will get a large dose of ¡Zap! radiation. Although seemingly over-simplistic, such avoidance behaviors could do wonders, if one takes the time to learn about and analyze one's own exposure threats. 

Also learn about nontoxic cleaners, body lotions, makeup, hygiene products, and yard/household chemicals that you can replace. Alternatives are usually easy to make at home, and much cheaper, believe it or not, while being equal or better in effects, while being both safe and healthy. Yes, it can be that simple. Next, try adding some things to your diet or health regimen that can help to detoxify. We are all poisoned by numerous harmful effects within the confines of our modern homes.

For nuclear radiation, in particular, bentonite clay and zeolite are recommended as detoxicants. They work via chelation, binding, or through cation exchanges, on an electrochemical basis, thus eliminating harmful radioactive effects from your body. They also aid in eliminating heavy metals, free radicals, and generalized toxins that our bodies are constantly assaulted with. A product called Sea Clear [™] is also available, commercially. It purportedly utilizes miso, fermented seaweed, and chlorella to chelate and cleanse away toxins and radioactive effects. It is advertised to be both effective and inexpensive, as a related product combination was used successfully by Russians following the Chernobyl disaster. I have not personally used the product, and relay such info as hearsay, only. However, it contains ingredients suggested by others for detox in general, as well as for radiation poisoning, in particular.

Prevention or limitation of RF/EMF/EMR contamination is also possible. Presumably, internal cell structures can be affected, closing off intracellular communication and inhibiting some internal protein processes. Waste products and free radicals may also become bound by mitochondria, compromising cell energy and function, as well as altering mRNA functions, eliciting apoptosis, or cell death, and/or even cancers, autism, or myriad other potential genetic disease processes. Altering of melatonin levels has also been attributed, with implications regarding cancers and sleep /mood change. All such effects listed may differ based upon developmental changes or cell age, etc.  The various effects are not fully known, but it may be better to be safe, rather than sorry. Pregnant females, newborns, and young children should be particularly susceptible, and should take added precautions.

Apparently, EMF/RF effects are implicated in many chronic diseases and generalized maladies for which there is often little recognition, and even fewer [specific] treatments by medical personnel. Do not simply disregard these potential toxic effects offhand, because they are not well publicized; again, blame our lamestream medical professions and the media for protecting big businesses involved, like power, TV, internet, and phone service providers…see also www.klinghardtacademy.com, or look up "Smart Meters & EMF Radiation -> The Health Crisis of our Time" on Youtube.

Using an RF meter [widely available] to determine hot spots, one can then shield an area to reduce or eliminate most RF exposure. This can be achieved via sheet foils, metal screens, or even certain cloths made with particular lining materials which help to shield RF. Such could be used on walls, as drapes, or even floor coverings, to provide a 'safe' room or area which is occupied for extended periods daily, or to shield particular sources such as wireless phones, routers, transformers, etc. It seems likely that it would be both practical and economically feasible to line a room with (aluminum or steel/metal) screening to virtually eliminate most RF/EMR/EMF effects. This could even be done in stealth by 'floating' a coat of drywall 'mud' over the screening, and perhaps then texturing the walls and ceilings affected. Another possibility would be to cover the screening shield with a typical paneling, wallboard, or siding, either indoors or outdoors, and ceilings could be protected by covering a room from within the attic area above a particular room. This would also potentially protect any electronics stored within such areas from damaging EMF pulses due to nuclear attack, and/or electronic warfare tactics already developed by modern militaries (and probably our own DHS) (See alsowww.norad4u.com , www.EmFnews.org, or ElectricSense.com for helpful info, and the video "Shielding RF Radiation with Aluminum Screening" on Youtube.) 

With regard to cell phone use, it is highly recommended that one stay as far away and clear of them as possible, and to use an earpiece/microphone combo if possible. In particular, eyes and gonads are susceptible to radiation effects, so act appropriately to limit or deflect exposures. 

There is some indication that some types of mushrooms, and particular extracts thereof, can help mitigate some harmful effects. Also, planting wheatgrass indoors, and/or utilizing sea salt lamps was recommended on a video on Youtube [™] called "Ways to Protect Yourself from EMF-RF Radiation from Smart Meters.mp4"; these are thought to act via external electromagnetic effects, similar to the zeolites and clay, used internally. Again, look into several avenues more in-depth, if you care to explore remedies further…

Another more recent source of potential harm comes from so-called 'smart meters' now often mandated for utilities [gas/electricity meters]. One video I watched compared a smart meter to cell phone radiation levels; the former seemed much more powerful, in terms of burst potentials and in the number of bursts/min. Cancer concerns, infertility effects, headaches, Heart problems, sleep disturbances, autistic-like effects, and numerous other negative heath aspects have been implicated. I have seen videos on Youtube that were pretty scary, in which people roamed around inside and outside of homes with measuring devices. However, i doubt that there has been any real research in this area [at least not published by industry], and few, if any, guidelines as to what levels are deemed harmful (umm…Idunno). 

The additive exposure to multiple sources in nearly every home and workplace combine to present an apparently high-risk exposure that one rarely even recognizes, and one may never hear about on lame-stream media outlets. See www.EMFNEWS.ORG for tips tp protect from EMF, and elsewhere; do your research. (note: High frequency [CFL] lights are also a concern, which can mobilize or disturb deposits of mercury already present in the body. Again, these are being promoted, even mandated, by our loving government 'nanny'. Why don't they tell us this shit can make us sick, or worse?  Yeah; I learn of this just after I get changed over to 100% CFL in my home…now what?Another 'conspiracy theory' in the making? humph!) There are also privacy issues involved with the use of these 'smart meters', through that exceeds the scope of this article. Often, there may be little that one can do to mitigate exposure, besides avoiding or shielding the areas of greatest transmission. Supposedly, one can refuse installation, but I have seen accounts on the local news, on the Alex Jones Show, and elsewhere, in which protester homeowners were actually arrested.
Go figure--welcome to Amerika…Seig Heil!

Alternatively, or in addition, one can reduce or eliminate many RF/EMF sources by simply unplugging appliances and devices and power blocks, using 'smart' power strips which shut down unused devices, phones, and/or turning off your wifi transmission when not in use. This can be easily done via the web interface on your router; if you don't know how this is done, look it up or check your manual…[note: I just took my own advice and turned mine off, again]. One could purchase an RF meter to evaluate risk throughout one's home or office, fairly inexpensively. I plan on looking further into this, and testing a few potential mitigations that I have in mind, eg'; faraday-like shielding, etc.

Check out Youtube for some vids or browse a wiki, or whatever you do to learn more about such things. A number of additional or supplemental detoxicant aids are listed below; learn about their uses and applications, and try them to both help heal and restore health--All of us are affected, for sure. Add to the list via your own researching, and share your knowledge.  ;)  Here's to good health for us all  :)


Helpful Radiation Detox/cleanse routines and solutions:


*****************************************************************************
[note: Some materials used herein may be from copyrighted sources; however, I am including any such occurrences under the protection of the "Fair Use" clause, being that:

a) any such addition is not a proportionally substantial part of the whole, and 
b) this article is of a non-commercial nature, and 
c) Use is restricted for the purpose[s] of public education, evaluation, and/or criticism/research (see below:)

Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use, the factors to be considered shall include:
1.The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 
2.the nature of the copyrighted work; 
3.the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 
4.the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. (added pub. l 94-553,
Title I, 101, Oct 19, 1976, 90 Stat 2546)]

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Reactions: 

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Hey, Santa…I want a Bushmaster!

Yup, all I want for Xmas is my two front teeth--umm, I mean--a Bushmaster (or any decent AR)! After the recent media assault re: yet another mass-loony-tunes shooting, I gotta change my wish list. Man, I cringed at the obvious propaganda play-up, aimed at instilling greater emotional reactions to the killings. The music and images used were spot-on to aggravate anger and sorrow. I'm talking so-called 'news' coverage, but especially the morning programs. I immediately said to my son…"You watch--they will be going after weapons now--their excuse is primed". The media adeptly began their propaganda Blitzkrieg--Geez--it was so transparent. They are using this tragedy as impetus for gun control, at a time when we Americans cannot afford to lose any more of our rights. Not like this...

Don't get me wrong; the killings are and were atrocious--unforgivable. I admit I was touched  by the media portrayal, too. I'm human, after all. However, this is a time when we all need to keep it rational, when we are talking about losing even MORE of our inalienable rights. There is simply no room for emotional knee-jerking responses to this latest event. Just say "NO"! We were suckered by a similar dialectic after 9/11; the 'Patriot' act. Since then, Bush n'Bama have eroded our constitutional rights via knee-jerk laws, as well as through quasi-legislative acts and orders that bypass Congress and the peoples' rights. After writing this, for example, I am probably now on some nebulous HL security watch-list as a terrorist. After all, I am Christian, and I do support: the Constitution and the rights contained therein, gun ownership, third-party advocates, Food gathering/preparedness, and other such 'radical' ideas they key on in their internet-spying sweeps. How many millions of us are there now?

One can only hope that there are enough rational people out there to fend off the latest push to rip guns out of civilian hands. Luckily, many Americans saw through the media ploy, and the handwriting was completely legible to more than just myself. (On early-morning news  today I saw that 130,000 new AR-type weapons were purchased in just the first few days following the propaganda blitz) We know your tactics and ploys, you damned media puppets...

I can't afford a decent AR, so that's why I'm asking Santa for one. Oh, and a couple thousand rounds too, eh?
Posted by at No comments:
Reactions: 

Saturday, December 8, 2012

Reality Sets in, Post-election…Should We Become Republocrats?


Reality Check: The 'Fiscal Cliff' Illusion and Election-year 'Blowback'

There seems to be an excess of smoke and mirror effects originating from both sides of the aisle. Recall that this upcoming 'event' was devised jointly via bipartisan committee agreement. In reality, it was a cowardly scapegoating move for both parties, so that neither would reap the blame, directly or immediately, for things that really need to get done (but that are dangerous to endorse, for either party). The fact is, both revenue increases and spending cuts are a true necessity, if we are going to limp on down the fiscal highway. Now, it's all about the blame-game though; who will take the brunt of the blame for the truly necessary cuts and revenue increases--who will be the real scapegoat?

Clearly, Democrats have no fear of being seen as protectors of the proletariat, so continuation of their ongoing class-warfare campaign is a no-brainer; they are pleased to be positioned squarely against the so-called 'rich' (defined as those earning >250K/yr). In fact, they have positioned themselves to be the peoples' heroes with regards to both taxing and spending. Advocating a tax on the highest 2% makes them seem like they support the 'people', or average, (lower?)mid-to-lower class earners--the majority--and so does proposing weak (essentially nil) budgetary cuts. In reality, its neither a real budget-boosting increase nor is it a seen to be a real personal burden to simply add a few additional points onto their (the 'rich') tax burden. That is, the resulting increase in revenue would  neither make much of a dent in the deficit, nor break the backs of the 'taxees'. The latter will either wince and grumble, or grin-and-bear it; either way, they're essentially screwed, and nobody else cares. Those 2% don't likely vote for them, anyways--a win-win.

On the other hand, by opposing either of the former (weak and ineffective) positions, Republicans are, by default, positioned as advocates of the 'rich', which feeds the class-warfare monster. Trying to reframe the issue to include such nebulous things as 'deductions', instead, further embeds them into the 'rich' camp; what the hell are deductions, to the average 'Joe', anyways? Likewise, advocating deeper cuts in spending is another alternative, but such would surely be demagogued as 'draconian' cuts, further alienating the party from the masses. However, there is a way out of this vicious circle of total BS; taking control of rhetoric and getting real.

Getting 'Real'
It is inevitable that some group must be taxed, but neither party is going to commit political suicide by suggesting the middle or lower classes should be targeted. However, In reality, everyone knows that we aren't going to get out of this fiscal mess without doing so. Lets talk about "fair": Talk about fairness. The reality is that everyone will have to suffer to some degree--and that seems only fair. Everybody will have to share in the solution; not just the top one or two percent. Maybe propose a sliding scale tax increase for everybody, with 5% on millionaires down to 1%  at lower brackets? yeah, I know--suicidal, but real. Likewise, There must be huge, even draconian, cuts to the budget. This means that non-discretionary spending must be reined in. This will inevitably lead to pain at the lower end of the financial totem pole. However, to do nothing, or not enough, means we all go down the tube, and I'm talking total financial collapse. On the brighter side, the reality is that after a (perhaps prolonged) period of shared pain, we would all benefit from the eventual recovery and a return to growth and prosperity. Try selling that to our instant-gratification/there-is-no-future generations…Ha! no way!

What, then, is a better 'reality-based' solution? Republicans need to reframe themselves as the protectors of ALL Americans--the protectors of our capitalistic society and for all the freedoms that go along with it. They need to make the government (not the 'rich', or Republicans) seem to be the 'bad guy', as Reagan did in (better) days-gone-by. Get to compromising on things that matter, while asserting points all Americans can agree with. Agree that, OK, the two percent will be taxed a bit more, and then agree to compromise with Dems on whatever minute cuts that eventually will be set in motion--as a compromise, they should be able to get some decreases in spending beyond those proposed initially by the Dems/Obama--Hey, it's a start. Not enough, agreeably, but a start. We could build from there in the near future.

Then pound the message into the public regarding the real problems facing us. The fact is, even if we SPENT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ($0.00) BEYOND NON-DISCRETIONARY SPENDING, WE WOULD STILL BE RUNNING A  TRILLION DOLLAR [+] DEFICIT--EVERY YEAR! Show them simple graphs to reinforce their understanding, because the truth of the matter is, the public has no real idea of the sad state of the Union! Educate the public! To anyone and everyone, it would seem, therefore, ridiculous to be adding additional 'stimulus' spending, as proposed by Obama--this could fix that obvious mistake, if it is pounded into the public psyche. Also, as suggested by Steve Forbes recently, set the Republicans as champions of the retired 'everyman' (OK, already mostly their base, but seems more universally friendly to all, as everyone [eventually] uses both Medicare and/or Social Security) by mandating that Social Security trust fund assets be converted to marketable Treasury bonds, instead of fake 'IOUs' now present[*]. Selling such bonds would raise some cash, while strengthening the public's confidence in the shaky (ponzi) scheme as well as government, in general, and Republicans, especially. Cut off subsidies to everybody and everything not required for national security. This means farmers, as well as oil companies. Give some of them a withdrawal period to ween off the teet. They will either adapt and survive, or fail. If they can only rely on taxpayers' money to get by, then they need to find something else to do or produce--simple as that. We also need to be assured that big businesses and banks (etc) will never be bailed out--ever--again. Again, if they fail because their practices were unsound, even criminal--as it has been--they deserve to fail. We all feel like we got the shaft, while big business got all the breaks--for free, and off our backs (then gave huge salaries and bonuses to CEOs); it's that kind of favoritism that is clearly not seen as fair to the taxpayers, and it widens the gap between the classes--not good.

Other 'Real' Reforms or Proposals that Republicans (and really, Everyone) Need to Back:

Support Freedom, Privacy, and Constitutional Rights as 'Untouchables'
The last few  (Obama and BushII) years have wreaked havoc upon our Constituion and our rights, fueled by so-called 'terrorist' threats. Frankly, the chances of being actually threatened by some terrorist act are pretty slim-to-none. I feel more threatened by losing my rights--and I WILL fight for them--with foreign or domestic enemy. So you Republicans better wake up and start championing our rights--and the potential loss thereof, or we might become really disenfranchised. Use fear--Scare the public [yes, scare!]--by constantly drumming about those fascist executive orders [&/or public bills], 'Homeland Security' measures (etc) allowing surveillance, arrest, and detainment of Americans without charges [even indefinitely]--and then propose some legislation to prevent governmental abuse of our God-given rights from happening--&/or go to court!! I tell you, I don't know why these things go on without more Republicans expressing extreme outrage, but if they don't 'nip this in the bud', I'm afraid they have lost my support. Period. Forever…There is just no excuse for undermining the Constitution, and our rights, as set forth therein!

Promise to Revamp the Tax Code, Balance the Budget, and Fix or Phase-out Social Security:
All, without putting anyone in the 'poor house'. Yes, the tax code is huge, unwieldy, and unfair. Simplify it and make it fair for everybody, and increase revenue overall, by 5%. Cut spending, across-the-board, by say, 10%. If we limit growth on all governmental programs, we should be able to balance the budget within a few years--a decade at most. Doing the foregoing would not only save America from itself, but also increase confidence in our government, and improve both the economy, as well as our credit rating. Keep a good safety net under us, and add flexibility in times of war or national distress or disaster. Make Social Security into a real retirement program, or simply mandate a retirement program for all, akin to health insurance, yet keeping it out of governmental 'hands'. We all know anything done by government is full of waste, fraud, and abuse, so keep it private, and keep it fair. Explain how the current ponzi scheme will not be tenable as the baby boomers drain off all the funds, leaving nothing for the next generations. One must also consider 'Means Testing' for 'entitlement' programs; Since we don't have enough for everyone to get benefits, in the long-run,we should reduce or eliminate providing them to those who don't 'need' them. The difficulty will be setting limits that would be seen as 'fair'. Perhaps a voluntary opt-out program with some added incentive, like discounted services or a tax break of some kind?This is a better alternative than raising the retirement or Medicare eligibility age, which is certainly not viewed positively, by anyone--and is not fair.This will also enamor the younger generation--future voters, and those who simply hate anyone who might be thought of as 'rich'.The truth is, if it's fair, we will all sacrifice in order to save America--just recall the last world war--Propaganda works wonders. 

Get Tough on Government Corruption:
Get tough on graft and corruption in the 'evil' government by proposing limits on, or better yet, eliminating lobbyist organizations' ability to 'buy' favors or influence via campaign financing. Get money out of the hands of Unions, corporations and PACs by limiting donations to small amounts by individuals ONLY, and make these transparent and open to public scrutiny. Perhaps limit contributions to those from their own home state or district? Pass a campaign finance bill mandating free TV  time to be equally divided among competing candidates or parties--the networks will hate it, but if framed properly, it could be their 'public service' contribution to our society, and their duty. Could this actually enable people to vote for a good candidate that perhaps has limited or no funding from outside--even a real 'average Joe'? I hope so! Eliminate the revolving door of congressional office holders going into lucrative 'consultant' jobs (etc) in corporations they helped via legislative action (yes, we, the people [aka everybody] see that as obvious corruption) and eliminate their retirement benefits altogether, unless they remain active as a career of 20+ years. Alternatively, put them all on Social Security retirement and healthcare plans (yup--they would have to pay in, like everyone else). This should be done for all government employees, as nobody should get any advantage over everyday people. These things are needed for Americans to see that their politicians are not just a bunch of crooks working for 'the man' or the banks/corporations. Yes, we need to see this happen!

Address Real and/or Perceived Waste, Fraud and Abuse: 
Do an independent, internal audit on every program of any significance to evaluate, then eliminate, waste, fraud, and abuse. Offer real incentives to governmental employees to increase efficiency and save our tax dollars. Doing the foregoing will both energize government employees, as well as increase positive opinions towards both them, and the government. It would also engender positive opinions upon those who promote and achieve success (Republicans )We need to see government working for us, and for public employees to be seen as public servants once again. EZ cost-cutting example: Cut off Saturday mail service. Yeah, we can wait till Monday…

Advance Both Education and Employment:
At present, we are getting an 'F' in education, even compared to most 3rd-world countries. This spells 'doom' for both our children and the future, as well as our future economy. Considering the current system pumps out increasingly worse students for increasingly greater per capita spending, we need a new system! We need to free up our children to become all that they can be, instead of holding back everyone to the level of the least able, as it is currently. My proposition? First, drop the requirement for attending 12 years of school, and stop reinforcing the status quo of current 'education' practices. Really, the limited skills needed to graduate are truly pathetic, by any standard. However, in a more modernized system, people could gain more knowledge, faster, and be on their way to a well-paying career in any field in which they truly excel. Everyone benefits, and America will remain prominent. How? Design a free, universal education plan that can be implemented as individualized and self-paced study, in addition to guided studies using instructors, as needed. A core curriculum could be produced that can be implemented online, with modules for myriad 'elective' or alternate topics, as desired, and with demonstrated proficiencies, even advanced, or college-level, topics. All that would be required are some computers and/or pads, or even a big screen monitor for larger classrooms, and the coursework modules. Such coursework could be used in extant schools, in which many parents rely upon now mostly as babysitters, or could be used at home, or in smaller study groups with supervision, or a combination of both, as needed. Those without a computer could lease/borrow one, or be given one every 'x' number of years--the money saved on school administration and salaries could be considerable, so this is not really a sticking point. Use a pool of current teachers and professors to get each subject's content certified as meeting minimum competency standards, at each level of study, and get started educating our children the right way--on an individualized level. States are already doing so; this can be done so that even home-schoolers can get the accredited skills and competencies in all subjects deemed (universally) necessary. States could maintain their own standards, as well as control content. Those particularly adept at one or more skills could also improve and accelerate their learning, independently, and perhaps enter into an industry or educational apprenticeship (see below). We could likely save a lot of money, time, and resources, while simultaneously improving the overall education of our children to be able to compete within the global market. 

As an adjunct, and in partnership with industry, devise and implement a voluntary mentoring/apprenticeship program for our youth, especially for those fields of employment and education in which we are lagging behind other countries, or behind the expected needs of the near future. First off, this would ensure that our changing needs for future technologies will be met. It would also encourage employment, and at an early age--gainful employment--not service jobs. This should be a partnership between people and industry, or educational institutes, not necessarily government. If it is beneficial to all parties, then it will be good for the economy, and will be deemed a good idea by both parents and youth. This could help the party gain support that will carry on for years, even generations.

Reform the Judicial and Prison Systems:
Stop dumping money into failed projects like the 'war on drugs' and on incarceration facilities for the 'victimless' crimes. Stop legislating morality and get out of people's lives, and out of our families' business. If we spent as much money on promoting economic growth or needed infrastructures as we did on prisons, we would not be in the spot we find ourselves. Geez--legalize or decriminalize drugs, and then tax them like cigarettes and booze, and we would be in the black in five years or less, probably without even cutting spending. Use some portion of those taxes to promote rehabs. Also, if we didn't have such a FAIL school system, there would be more competent people to be working at jobs, instead of leeching their lives away in our prisons. Economic improvements set in motion by aforementioned proposals would also mean more employment for underemployed populations, decreasing crime rates overall. For those imprisoned, I suggest we mandate that they work in order to pay for their own room and boarding costs. Perhaps we would not need illegal immigrants to pick our farm produce, do our landscaping, keep our common areas clean,etc., if we had access to convict labor? Maybe even get a profit for the states? Maybe a convict could learn a trade that could keep them out of prison in the future? Maybe we could compete against the Chinese if we trained cons to work in actual factories?These are really worth doing, or at least considering.

At any rate, if the Republicans can't get it together, and Democrats continue their socialistic, class-warfare routines, maybe we should all form a moderate, middle ground party aimed at American peoples' core values and virtues--without all the posturing and rhetoric, and BS social issues--the Republocrats? Think about it...


Posted by at No comments:
Reactions: 
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)